Bone metastasis as a non-stochastic process

Bone metastasis as a non-stochastic process

Mew frypow (1989)29.279281 @ LtqrmmGroupUK Ltd1989 Bone Metastasis M. CHIGIRA, as a Non-Stochastic Process K. NODA and H. WATANABE Department of ...

314KB Sizes 0 Downloads 32 Views

Mew frypow (1989)29.279281 @ LtqrmmGroupUK Ltd1989

Bone Metastasis M. CHIGIRA,

as a Non-Stochastic

Process

K. NODA and H. WATANABE

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maebashi, Gunma, 371 Japan

Gunma University

School of Medicine,

3- 39-22 Showa,

Abstract - Bone metastasis may be considered a non-stochastic process, since the blood flow in bone is lower than that in other organs and most cancers do not have a tendency to metastasize to bone in in vivo experiments. Furthermore, the experimental model of bone metastasis, based on the ligation of major venous flow, can not explain the widespread bone metastasis which is commonly observed in clinical cases. These observations may be explained by the hypothesis that tumor cells have a phenotype for translocating to specific tissues and that tumor cell growth is controlled by the microenvironmental factors in situ.

Introduction The biology of bone metastasis is poorly understood. This is, in part, due to the lack of good animal models (l), although the skeleton is the most common site of metastasis of prostate and breast cancer (2, 3). Many animal models of cancer have been developed. However, only in a small number of these has the tumor been reported to metastasize to bone (4-6). Batson and Shevrin proposed that prostate tumor cells only spread to the skeleton via the vertebral venous plexus under conditions of increased intra-abdominal pressure or of ligation of the inferior vena cava (1, 4). These data suggest that bone metastasis is not a stochastic process in nature. Discussion Lymphatic

vessels

accompany

the

periosteal

vascular plexuses but their presence within the bone substances has never been convincingly demonstrated (7, 8), although lymphangioma of the bone has rarely been reported (9). Lymphatic flow is a centrifugal process, if it is present, since venous blood flow is similar (10). Retrograde metastasis in lymphatic channels is rare, and most cancers arise in the abdomen and thorax. Under these conditions, it is considered that metastasis via lymphatic channels is negligible in bone metastasis and that the vascular channel is the major root of “blood-borne” metastasis to bone. The average value for bone blood flow which has been proposed by Shim and Gross as about 10 ml/min/lOO mg appears reasonable (11-16). Total skeletal blood flow is under 10 per cent of the cardiac output, although the skeletal weight represents approximately 10% of the body weight in adults (14, 15). These values are much lower than those for the lung,

279

280 liver, kidney, and brain. It is suggested that blood flow may not be a major factor in bloodborne metastasis. A unique vascular system called the Haversian capillary has been reported (10). However, this transcortical system can not play an important role in bone metastasis, since cortical bone is not a primary area in bone metastasis, although the central medullary sinus is one of the sinusoids reported elsewhere (10). Bone is not the first capillary bed encountered after the extravasation of cancer cells, because of their anatomical location. It is difficult for us to explain the high incidence of cancer me.tastasis with the anatomical uniqueness of bone. Coffey and Isaacs demonstrated that highly metastatic carcinoma lines do not have a tendency to metastasize to bone (5, 6). Several authors showed that the increaied intra-abdominal pressure and the ligation of the vena cava inferior after intravenous inoculation of tumor cells induced vertebral metastasis (1, 4, 17, 18), although injection of the cells from the parent line subcutaneously or via the tail vein without caval occlusion did not result in bone lesions these experiments can be (19). However, considered as a model of metastasis to the lumbar spine, and can not explain the widespread bone metastasis which is more common in clinical experience (3). Metastasis to the skull, cervical spine, and long bones will not be simulated by this method, furthermore, venous obstruction can rarely be shown in the patients with cancer. These animal models are not acceptable for natural metastasis. In animal experiments, the preference of organ and tissue can not be explained by a sequential, selective and stochastic process (20-25), although these processes have been fully discussed (26-29). The initial distribution of tumor cells in an organ capillary can not explain the outcome of metastasis, and vascular anatomy is not sufficient to explain all aspects of tumor dissemination (30-32). Circulating tumor cells may show a preference for certain ectopitally transplanted organs (33-35). Furthermore, after intra-arterial injection, each tumor appears to establish its own metastatic pattern (36). Actually, Fidler established several melanoma cell lines that metastasize predominantly to the brain, although these lines did not produce a mass in the lung after inoculation via the tail vein (37). The authors also demonstrated that highly metastatic clones lost their tumorigenicity at the subcutaneous inoculation site (38). In 1889,

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES

Paget proposed the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis (23). The exact mechanisms by which the organ environment is able to modulate the proliferation of tumor cells is unclear (39), although this hypothesis has received considerable support from experimental systems (33, 34, 39, 40) and human studies (41, 42). These observations can be explained by the character of the tumor cell (38) and by the growth control in situ (30, 38). For example, some tumor cells most often of lymphoid or macrophage origin, do not grow in the first capillary bed encountered after intravenous injection (33-35). These data suggest that the growth of metastatic cells is inhibited in the first capillary bed such as the lung and liver. The microenvironmental cell-to-cell interaction which controls the tumor growth in situ, should be studied further. Acknowledgements We are very grateful to Drs Toru Shimizu and Satoru Arita, and Prof. Eiichi Udagawa, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gunma University, for their valuable discussion. ThiH work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Grant C-62570675 from the Japanese Ministry of Education.

References 1. Shevrin D H, Kukreja S C, Ghosh L, and Lad T E. Development of skeletal metastasis by human prostate cancer in athymic nude mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 6: 401, 1988 2. De La Monde S M, Moore G W, and Hutchins G M. Metastatic behavior of prostate cancer. Cancer 58: 985, 1986 3. Kamby C, Vejborg I, Daugaard S, Guldhammer B, Dirksen H, Rossing N, and Mouridsen H T Clinical and radiologic characteristics of bone metastasis in breast cancer. Cancer 60: 2527, 1987 4. Batson 0 V. The function of the vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastasis. Ann Surg 112: 138, 1940 5. Coffey D S, and DeLong R P. Animal models for the studv of Drostatic cancer. Prostate Cancer (ed. Murphv G Pj pp 69, Littleton, M A: PSG Publishing Co. 19?‘96. Isaacs J T. Isaacs W B. Feitz W F J. and Scheres J. Establishm&t and characterization of s&en Dunning rat prostatic cancer cell lines and their use in developing methods for predicting metastatic abilities of prostatic cancers. The Prostate 9: 261, 1986 7. In blood vessels and nerves of bone. Gray’s Anatomy 35th ed. (ed. Warwick R) pp 222, Longman Group Ltd., 1973 8. Seligher W G. Tissue fluid movements in compact bone. Anat Ret 166: 247, 1970 9. Bullogh P G, and Goodfekkiw J W. Solitary lymphangioma of bone. J Bone and Joint Surg 58-A: 418, 1976 10. Lopez-Curto J A, Bassingthwaighte J B, and Kelly P J.

BONE METASTASIS AS A NON-STOCHASTIC

PROCESS

281

Thornburg L, and Glushko V. Use of a reconstituted Anatomy of microvasculature of the tibia1 diaphysis of basement membrane to measure cell invasiveness and the aduli dog. J Bone Joint Surg 62-A: 1362, i98b select for highly invasive tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 11. Shim S S Phvsioloev of blood circulation of bone. J Bone 83: 465, 1986 Joint Surg 56-A: 8v2, 1968 29. Frost P, and Fidler I J. Biology of- metastasis. Caricer 12. Shim S S, Patterson F P, and Coop D H. Blood flow 58: 550, 1986 through different regions of long bone measured by a 30. Yamori T, Iida H, Tsukagoshi S, and Tsuruo T. Growth bone-seeking radioisotope method. Surg Gynecol Obestet stimulating activity of lung extract on lung-colonizing 58: 132, 1971 colon 26 clones and its partial characterization. Clin Exp 13. Shim S S. Mikkmavesa S, Mac Pherson G D. Bone and skeletal blood flow in man measured by a radioisotopic Metastasis 6: 131, 1988 (31. Orr F W, Young L, King G M, and Adamson I Y R. method. Can J Surg 38: 14, 1971 Preferential growth of metastatic tumors at the pleural 14. Gross P M. Marcus M L, and Heistad D D. Current surface of mouse lung. Clin Exp Metastasis 6: 221, 1988 concepts Review Measurement of blood flow to bone and marrow in experimental animal by means of the micros32. Nagashima A, Yasumoto K, Nakahashi H, Furukawa T, phere technique. J Bone Joint Surg 63-A: 1028, 1981 Inokuchi K, and Nomoto K. Establishment and characterization of high- and low-metastatic clones derived 1.5. Ficat R P, and Arlet J. Ischemia and necrosis of bone (ed. by Hungerford D S) pp 21, Williams & Wilkins 19 from a methylcholanthrene induced rat fibrosarcoma. Cancer Res 46: 4420, 1986 16. Tondevold E. Haemodynamics of long bones. Acta 33. Hart I R, and Fidler I J. Cancer invasion and metastasis. Orthop Stand 54: supple. 205, 1983 Q Rev Bioi 55: 121, 1980 17. Coman D R, b,.d DeLong R P. The rote of the vertebral 34. Hart I R, Talmage J E, and Fidler I J. Metastatic venous system in the metastasis of cancer to the spinal behavior of a murine reticulum cell sarcoma exhibiting column. Cancer 4: 610, 1951 organ-specific growth. Cancer Res 41: 1281, 1981 18. Franks L M. The spread of prostatic carcinoma to the bones. J Path Bact 66: 91, 1953 35. Kinsey D L. An experimental study of preferential metastasis. Cancer 13: 674, 1960 19. Shevrin D H, Kukreja S C, Vincic B, and Lad T E. Patterns of spontaneous metastasis by human prostate 36. Murphy P, Taylor I, and Alexander P. Organ distribucancer grown in athymic nude mice. Proc Am Ass tion of metastases following injection of syngeneic rat Cancer Res 27: 256, 1986 tumor cells into the arterial circulation via the left 20. Poste G, and Greig R. On the genesis and regulation of ventricle; in Hellman, Eccles, Treatment of metastasis: cellular heterogeneity in malignant tumors. Invasion problems and prospects p 191 .(Taylor & Francis, Metastasis 2: 137, 1982 London) 1985 21. Price J E, Aukerman S L, and Fidler I J. Evidence that 37. Fidler 1 J. Selection of successive tumor lines for the process of murine melanoma metastasis is sequential metastasis. Nature 242: 148, 1973 and selective and contains stochastic elements. Cancer 38. Chigira M, and Watanabe H. Establishment of highRes 46: 5172, 1986 metastatic clones without tumorigenicity derived from and nonrandom processes in 22. Weiss L. Random Dunn osteosarcoma. Tumor Biol in press 1988 metastasis and metastatic inefficiency. Invasion Metastasis 39. Naito S, Giavazzi R, and Fidler I J. Correlation between 3: 193, 1983 the in vitro interaction of tumor cells with an organ 23. Paget S. The distribution of secondary growth in cancer environment and metastatic behavior in vivo. Invasion of the breast. Lancet 1: 571, 1889 Metastasis 7: 16, 1987 40. Poste G, Nicolson G L. Arrest and metastasis of blood24. Tarin D, and Price J E. Metastatic colonisation potential of primary tumor cells in mice. Br J Cancer 39: 740, 1979 borne tumor cells are modified by fusion of plasma 25. Tarin D, and Price J E. Influence of microenvironment membrane vesicles from highly metastatic cells. Proc and vascular anatomy on “metastatic” colonization Natl Acad Sci (USA) 77: 399, 1980 potential of mammary tumors. Cancer Res 41: 3604, 41. Tarin D, Vass A C R. Kettewell M G W, Price J E. 1981 Absence of metastatic sequelae during long-term treat26. Fidler 1 J. Gersten D W, and Hart I R. The biology of ment of malignant ascites by peritoneovenous shunting. cancer invasion and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res 28: 149. Invasion Metastasis 4: 1, 1984 1978 42. Tarin D, Price J E, Kettlewell M G W, Souter R G, 27. Liotta L A. Tumor invasion and metastases. Role of the Vass A C R, and Crossley B. Mechanisms of human extracellular matrix. Cancer Res 46: 1,. 1986 tumor metastasis studied in patients with peritoneov28:Terranova V P. Hujanen E S, Loeb D M, Martin G R. enous shunts. Cancer Res 44: 3584, 1984