Immunoreactive p53 Protein in High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Immunoreactive p53 Protein in High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Path. Res. Pract. 191, 881- 887 (1995) Immunoreactive pS 3 Protein in High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia P. A. Humphrey and P. E. Swanson...

2MB Sizes 1 Downloads 31 Views

Path. Res. Pract. 191, 881- 887 (1995)

Immunoreactive pS 3 Protein in High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia P. A. Humphrey and P. E. Swanson Lauren V. Ackerman Laboratory of Surgical, Pathology, Department of Pathology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, U. S.A.

SUMMARY p53 protein accumulation in the nuclei of prostatic carcinoma cells, as detected by immunohistochemistry, has been associated with increased cell proliferation rate, increased histologic grade and stage, androgen independence and decreased patient survival. Little is known, however, of p53 in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), the putative precursor proliferation for moderately to poorly differentiated peripheral zone carcinoma of the prostate. In this investigation, we utilized a panel of antibodies reactive with p53 protein to assess p53 protein accumulation in prostatic epithelial hyperplasia, PIN and prostatic carcinoma. Forty patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy were selected for study based on the presence of high grade PIN and carcinoma in the same prostate tissue block. Tissue sections were treated with microwave irradiation for antigen retrieval, and antibodies DO-7, PAb1801 and CM-l were used for immunohistochemical analysis. An intense signal for immunoreactive p53 was identified in the nuclei of 7140 (17.5%) clinically-localized prostatic carcinomas. In all 7 cases, high grade PIN also exhibited intense p53 immunoreactivity, whereas only one case of hyperplasia contained immunoreactive p53 protein. These findings support a close relationship between high grade PIN and carcinoma in a subset of primary prostatic carcinomas with high-level p53 protein accumulation.

Introduction Mutation of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene is currently considered the most common genetic abnormality in human cancer 9,19,21,23,29,42 with 37% of all types of malignancies exhibiting mutation of p53 19 . Only relatively few (n =131) cases of prostatic carcinoma have been assessed for p53 mutations by DNA sequencingll ,19. Awide incidence range of p53 mutation, from 0%26 to 42%11, has been reported for clinically localized carcinoma. The timing of p53 gene mutation is also uncertain. While many studies have concluded that p53 gene mutation is a late event in the progression of © 1995 by Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

prostatic carcinoma2,5,20,26,37, a recently published investigation 11 documented mutations in a substantial fraction of low-grade and low-stage carcinomas, suggesting that p53 mutations might occur early in tumor formation. Immunohistochemical detection of accumulated p53 protein in the nuclei of malignant tumor cells is predictive, for some tumor types, of missense point mutation in the p53 gene B . Most p53 mutations may be detected by immunohistochemical staining for the p53 protein, but potentially 20% of all mutants may not be identified by this method. Moreover, mechanisms do exist that result in nuclear p53 protein accumulation in 0344-0338/95/0191-0881$3.50/0

882 . P. A. Humphrey and P. E. Swanson

the absence of gene mutation 23 . For prostatic carcinoma, very good to excellent concordance between p53 gene mutation and detection of immunoreactive p53 protein has been observed 5, 12,37. Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein in prostatic carcinoma has been associated in some, but not all, studies with higher histologic grade, ONA aneuploidy, high tumor cell proliferation rate, high stage and decreased patient survivaF,5, 16,20,27,28,34,37, 43,45-48. The timing of p53 protein accumulation, as determined by immunohistochemical analysis in hyperplasia, PIN and carcinoma in the prostate gland, has not been well-established. Most studies have not identified immunoreactive p53 protein in the nuclei of hyperplastic epithelial cells, but several recent studies 15 ,27 indicate that hyperplastic epithelial cell nuclei may accumulate detectable quantities of p53. Little is known of immunoreactive p53 in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), the putative precursor for many invasive carcinomas of the prostate. No immunoreactive p53 was identifed in high-grade PIN in one study37, while in a second study (thus far reported only in abstract form 28 ) p53 was detected in PIN. Two additional investigations 43 ,46 have described accumulation of p53 protein in a few cases (total n =5) of PIN of unspecified grade. The specific aim of this investigation was to characterize immunoreactive p53 in high-grade PIN and compare the expression to that in usual epithelial hyperplasia and carcinoma in the same cases. We utilized a panel of antibodies directed against different epitopes on the p53 protein to detect p53 protein accumulation in radical prostatectomy tissues from 40 patients. The results show a concordance between highlevel p53 protein immunoreactivity in high-grade PIN and carcinoma, suggesting that p53 protein accumulation may be an early event, occurring at the stage of intraepithelial neoplasia, for those primary prostatic carcinomas with p53 protein accumulation. Results Monoclonal antibody 00-7 in conjunction with microwave irradiation of tissue sections yielded the highest sensitivity in detecting p53 j,rotein. This finding is consistent with a recent report 3 that found 00-7 to be one of the anti-p53 antibodies that yielded the most consistent staining. Table 1 summarizes the results for detection of immunoreactive p53 by antibody

Table 1. Immunoreactive p53 protein in the prostate Epithelial Proliferation Hyperplasia High-Grade PIN Carcinoma

15 16




+ intense

15 15

6 2

1 7




- : No immunostaining, ±: Less than 5% nuclei stained, than 5% nuclei stained, + intense: Greater than 5% nuclei stained with high intensity.

+: Greater

00-7. Use of PAb 1801 was confirmatory in identification of immunoreactive p53 in the intensely positive category but this antibody was less sensitive, under the conditions employed, in detection of lesser degrees of p53 protein accumulation. Immunostains using CM1 antibody in this study produced high stromal and cytoplasmic staining and were not considered interpretable. The results presented below are those obtained with antibody 00-7. Immunoreactive p53 protein was identified in nuclei of hyperplastic epithelial cells, nuclei of high-grade PIN and nuclei of invasive carcinoma. Seven of thirty-seven cases (18.9%) of usual hyperplasia exhibited nuclear staining for p53. Most (617) of these cases were of lower-level immunostaining intensity, with one case showing intense immunoreactivity for p53. Both hyperplastic luminal and basal cell nuclei exhibited staining for p53. In the case with an intense signal, nuclei in atrophic glands were also stained. High-grade PIN had immunoreactive p53 protein in 9/40 (22.5%) cases. In contrast to usual hyperplasia, most (719) cases of high-grade PIN with immunoreactive p53 displayed intense reactivity. Immunoreactive p53 was identified in all four architectural patterns of high-grade PIN8, including micropapillary and tufted patterns (Fig. 1), cribriform pattern (Fig. 2) and flat pattern (Fig. 3). Both isolated high-grade PIN and high-grade PIN intermingled with invasive carcinoma (Figs. 1 and 4) were positive for p53 protein. Where transitions between high-grade PIN and invasive carcinoma were identified, concordance in p53 protein accumulation in the intraepithelial and invasive neoplastic components could often be identified (Fig. 4). Of significance, there was concordance between high-grade PIN and carcinoma for cases with an intense signal for p53. In the 7 cases of carcinoma with intensely stained nuclei, a similarly intense signal was identifed in high-grade PIN on the same slide. Two

Fig. 1. Immunoreactive p53 protein in micropapillary and tufted types of high-grade PIN, as defined by Bostwick et al. 8• Ad- ~ jacent small-acinar invasive adenocarcinoma also exhibits accumulation of p53 protein (Diaminobenzidine as chromogen in ABC immunoperoxidase method, with hematoxylin counterstain, x 68). - Fig. 2 Cribriform type of high-grade PIN with immunoreactive p53. Basal cells in this gland are negative for p53, as are surrounding fibromuscular cell nuclei (Diaminobenzidine as chromogen in ABC immunoperoxidase method, with hematoxylin counterstain, x 168). - Fig. 3. Partial gland involvement by flat type of high-grade PIN, with immunoreactive p53 in nuclei of PIN cells (Diaminobenzidine as chromogen in ABC immunoperoxidase method, with hematoxylin counterstain, x 168). - Fig. 4. Transition between high-grade PIN and invasive carcinoma, with p53 protein accumulation in both the intra epithelial and invasive elements (Diaminobenzidine as chromogen in ABC immunoperoxidase method, with hematoxylin counterstain, x 168).

884 . P. A. Humphrey and P. E. Swanson Table 2. Nuclear accumulation of immunoreactive p53 protein in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: Literature surveya Article 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Tissue fixation Antibody

Immunoreactive p53

Soini et al. 1992 Thompson et al. 1992 Visakorpi et al. 1992 Fox et al. 1993

formalin acetone formalin formalin

2/34 5129 23/137

(6%) (17%) (17%)

Navone et al. 1993 b Bookstein et al. 1993 Berner et al. 1993 Loning et al. 1993 Thomas et al. 1993 Van Veldhuizen et al. 1993 Kallakury et al. 1994 b Dinjens et al. 1994 Vesalainen et al. 1994 Ittman et al. 1994 b Aprikian et al. 1994 Henke et al. 1994 b Losi et al. 1994

formalin formalin formalin formalin mercury formalin formalin ethanol formalin formalin formalin formalin formalin

6145 2/45 171140 18/91 14/42 0110 15/26 15/107 2120 21/139 0/29 9148 35173

(13%) (4.4%) (12.1%) (19.8%) (33.3%) (0%) (57.8%) (14%) (10%) (15%) (0%) (19%) (48%)

0145 2/85 2/39 12/40

(0%) (2.4%) (5.1%) (30%)

18. Voeller et al. 1994 19. Ohori et al. 1994 20. Current studyb

methanol formalin formalin

CM-l PAb240 CM-l PAb1801, D07 PAb240, CM-1 CM-1 PAb1801, CM-1 Not specified Not specified CM-1 Pab240, Pb1801 DO-1 PAb1801 CM-1 CM-1 PAb1801, CM-l DO-7 PAb1801, DO-7 CM-1 PAb1801 CM-1 DO-7 Total

aData from full-length published articles only,



200/1269 (15.8%)

Microwave irradiation used in antigen retrieval.

cases of high-grade PIN exhibited lower intensity of staining, and, in these two cases, the invasive carcinoma component also exhibited low intensity staining. For the five cases of carcinoma with weaker positive staining, the associated high-grade PIN exhibited weaker positive staining in 2 cases, while only rare cells stained in 3 cases. Twelve of 40 (30%) invasive carcinomas exhibited immunoreactive p53, seven of which exhibited intense staining. This incidence of 30% is higher than the literature incidence in aggregate (15.8%; see Table 2), but a high incidence of p53 protein accumulation in prostatic carcinoma has been found in a recent study20 which also used microwave irradiation of tissue sections for antigen retrieval and antibody DO-7 for p53 detection. Discussion Our results indicate that nuclear p53 protein accumulation, as defined by immunohistochemical reactivity with antibody DO-7, occurs in a substantial group of cases of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Furthermore, the concordance of an intense p53 signal between high-grade PIN and invasive carcinoma provides further support for a close relationship between these two lesions. We found that 22.5% of 40 cases of high-grade PIN associated with carcinoma contain immunoreactive

p53. Only a few manuscripts 37,43,46 have reported p53 protein accumulation in PIN. In one study37, no staining was identified in 17 cases of high-grade PIN. This finding was obtained with the use of antibody CM-l, while our immunohistochemical protocol employed antibody DO-7 with antigen retrieval by microwave irradiation, which has been shown to enhance detection of p53 30 . In two other studies43 ,46, p5 3 protein accumulation was described (but not illustrated) in 5 cases, but the grade of PIN was not provided. Finally, detection of immunoreactive p53 in PIN of unspecified grade has been reported in abstract form 28 ; of note, the incidence of p53 protein accumulation in PIN reported in this abstract (25%) is similar to the incidence reported here (22.5%) and both studies utilized antibody DO-7. Concordance of an intense immunohistochemical signal for p53 was observed between high-grade PIN and invasive carcinoma in seven cases. In only one of these cases was an intense signal for p53 observed in usual hyperplasia. Thus, high-grade PIN is more closely linked to invasive carcinoma than usual hyperplasia when evaluated for the accumulation of p53 protein. This intense signal for p53 joins an ever-growing list of morphologic, histochemical, immunophenotypic and genetic similarities between high-grade PIN and invasive carcinoma 1, 7. The timing of p53 gene mutation and protein accumulation in the prostatic epithelial proliferation spectrum of hyperplasia, intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma is uncertain. p53 gene mutations, which of-

p53 in PIN . 885

ten but not always result in nuclear p53 protein accumulation 23 , have been detected in usual hyperplasia 11,35 and carcinoma in the prostateS, 12-14, 19,25,31,37,45,49. p53 protein accumulation, as detected by immunohistochemistry, has been identified in usual hyperplasia 15,27, PIN28,43,46 and carcinoma (Table 2). Several studies have reported an association of p53 gene mutation and protein accumulation with advanced stage prostatic carcinomas 2,5,20,26,37,43 such that the highest incidence of p53 protein accumulation occurs in metastatic sites, particularly in metastatic growths in the bone marrow. However, other inquiries ll ,12,34,43,47 have failed to demonstrate such an association with advanced stage. Indeed, in a recent reportll based on the finding of p53 mutations in low-stage and low-grade tumors, it was proposed that p53 mutations might occur early in tumor formation. Our data suggest that high-level p53 protein accumulation occurs early, at the level of high-grade PIN, in that subset (17.5%) of primary prostatic carcinomas that exhibit intense staining for p53. That intraepithelial neoplastic proliferations may harbor altered p53 has been well-documented in other anatomic sites such as the breast24 ,39. It is not known if p53 protein accumulation is predictive of missense mutation in the p53 gene in highgrade PIN. To address this, future studies should entail microdissection of hyperplasia, PIN and carcinoma, with PCR-SSCP screening for p53 gene mutation followed by direct sequencing of identified mutants. It will be of particular interest to define the relationship between the presence and degree of p53 protein accumulation in these various epithelial proliferations with the presence or absence of mutations in DNA. Such a parallel analysis has not yet been performed for prostatic usual hyperplasia and high-grade PIN. However, it should be noted that p53 protein accumulation, as detected by immunohistochemistry, may be by itself an important indicator of altered p53 function. In summary, this immunohistochemical analysis of immunoreactive p53 has provided evidence of concordance of high-level p53 protein accumulation in highgrade PIN and associated invasive carcinoma, suggesting a role of p53 in early development of that subset of primary prostatic carcinomas with p53 protein alteration. Materials and Methods This study included 40 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined (clinical stage B or T2) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients were selected based on the presence of high-grade PIN and carcinoma on the same slide. The rationale for this selection was that immunohistochemical staining for p53 protein in high-grade PIN and carcinoma could be directly compared on the same slide. In 37 of 40 cases, foci of usual epithelial hyperplasia were also available for assessment of p53 immunoreactivity. Highgrade PIN (also known as PIN grade 2 and 3, or moderate and severe dysplasia) was morphologically defined as previously described 6,33. Gleason's histologic grade was deter-

mined 17,18 and pathologic stage was assigned 40 • The pathological features of the carcinomas in the radical prostatectomy specimens were as follows: mean Gleason score =6.1 (range, 3-9); mean percentage gland involvement carcinoma =11 % (range, 1-24%). Most cases were pathologic stage T2 (48%) or T3 (44%), and 2 cases were pathologic stage T4. Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein was performed on 5-micron sections from formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissue blocks. The sections were mounted on acid-cleaned glass slides and heated for 1 h at 55°C. Slides were dewaxed and dehydrated and then immersed for 30 min in absolute methanol containing 0.6% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. After rehydration through graded ethanols and distilled water, sections were immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer (10 mM citrate monohydrate in distilled water, pH 6.0) in plastic Coplin jars and subjected to microwave irradiation (600 W; 2,450 MHz) for 4 min. After cooling to room temperature, slides were removed to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) for 10 min. Serial sections were then overlaid with mouse monoclonal antibody DO-7 (Dako Corporation, Carpinteria CA; diluted 1: 150 from commercial stock), mouse monoclonal antibody PAb1801 (BioGenex Laboratories, Dublin CA; diluted 1 : 2 from commercial stock), or rabbit polyclonal antibody CM-l (Oncogene Science, Manhassett, NY; diluted 1: 1600 from commercial stock) and incubated for 18 h in a moisture chamber at 4°C. Monoclonal antibody DO-7 and monoclonal antibody PAb1801 bind to epitopes at the amino-terminal end of the p53 protein 3,50, while polyclonal antibody CM-llikely binds to multiple epitopes on the p53 protein 36 • The avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) method was performed in all cases (VectaStain ABC Elite Mouse Universal Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, U.S.A.)22. Chromogenic development resulted from immersion of slides in 3,3'-diaminobenizidine tetrahydrochloride [Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.; 0.5 mg/ml, containing 0.003% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide] for ::; 10 min. The reaction product was enhanced by brief exposure to 0.125% (w/v) osmium tetroxide. Slides were counterstained in Harris's hematoxylin and covers lipped in a synthetic mounting medium. The positive control for p53 immunoreactivity consisted of formalin-fixed sections from an adenocarcinoma of the small intestine with known accumulation of the p53 protein. Negative internal controls were stromal cell and lymphocytic nuclei. A stain was interpreted as positive only if nuclear reactivity was obtained in > 5% of the nuclei of neoplastic cells. Cases were designated as ± if only rare (less than 5%) nuclei were stained. Negative controls were performed by substituting primary antibody with nonimune murine ascites fluid or nonimmune rabbit immunoglobulin.

References 1 Amin MB, Ro JY, Ayala AG (1993) Putative precursor lesions of prostatic adenocarcinoma: Fact or fiction? Mod Pathol 6: 476-483 2 Aprikian AG, Sarkis AS, Fair WR, Zhang Z-F, Fuks Z, Cordon-Cardo C (1994) Immunohistochemical determination of p53 protein nuclear accumulation in prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol151: 1276-1280 3 Banks L, Matlashewski G, Crawford L (1986) Isolation of human-p5 3-specific monoclonal antibodies and their use in the studies of human p53 expression. Eur J Biochem 159: 529-534

886 . P. A. Humphrey and P. E. Swanson 4 Berner A, Nesland JM, Waehre H, Silde J, Fossa SD (1993) Hormone resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma. An evaluation of prognostic factors in pre- and post-treatment specimens. Br J Cancer 68: 380-384 5 Bookstein R, MacGrogan D, Hilsenbeck SG, Sharkey F, Allred DC (1993) p53 is mutated in a subset of advancedstafe prostate cancers. Cancer Res 53: 3369-3373 Bostwick DG, Brawer MK (1987) Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia and early invasion in prostate cancer. Cancer 59: 788-794 7 Bostwick DG, Srigley JR (1990) Premalignant lesions. In: Bostwick DG (Ed) Pathology of the Prostate, 37-59. Churchill Livingstone, New York 8 Bostwick DG, Amin MB, Dundore D, Marsh W, Schultz DS (1993) Architectural patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol 24: 298-310 9 Caron de Fromental C, Soussi T (1992) TP53 tumor suppressor gene. A model for investigating human mutagenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4: 1-15 10 Castagnaro M, Yandell DW, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Wolfe HJ, Poremba C (1993) Human androgen receptor gene mutations and p53 gene analysis in advanced prostate cancer. Verh Dtsch Ges Path 77: 119-123 11 Chi S-G, deVere White RW, Meyers FJ, Siders DB, Lee F, Gumerlock PH (1994) p53 in prostate cancer: Frequent expressed transition mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 926 - 933 12 Dinjens WNM, van der Wei den MM, Schroeder FH, Bosman FT, Trapman J (1994) Frequency and characterization of p53 mutations in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 56: 630-633 13 Effert PJ, Neubauer A., Walther PJ, Liu ET (1992) Alterations of the p53 gene are associated with the progression of a human prostate cancer. J Urol147: 789-793 14 Effect PJ, McCoy RH, Walther PJ, Liu ET (1993) p53 gene alterations in human prostate carcinoma. J Urol 150: 257-261 15 Foster CS, McLoughlinJ, Bashir I, Abel PD (1992) Markers of the metastatic phenotype in prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 23: 381-394 16 Fox SB, Persad RA, Royds I, Kore RN, Silcocks PB, Collins CC (1993) p53 and c-myc expression in stage A1 prostatic adenocarcinoma: Useful prognostic determinants? J Urol15 0: 490-494 17 Gleason D (1977) Histologic grading and clinical staging of carcinoma of the prostate. In: Tannenbaum M (Ed) Urologic Pathology: The Prostate: 171-198. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 18 Gleason DF (1992) Histologic grading of prostate cancer: A perspective. Hum Pathol23: 273-279 19 Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC (1994) Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 54: 4855-4878 20 Henke R-P, Kruger E, Ayhan N, Hubner D, Hammerer P, Huland H ( 1994) Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein in human prostatic cancer. J Urol 152: 1297-1301 21 Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC (1991) p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 253: 49-53 22 Hsu S-M, Raine L, Fanger H (1981) Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabelled antibody procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29: 577-580 23 Humphrey PA (1994) p53: Mutations and immunohistochemical detection, with a focus on alterations in urologic malignancies. In: Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Anderson RE, Benson ES, Cotran RS, Jarett L, Wick MR, Zumvalt RE

(Eds). Advances in Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 7: 579-606. Mosby Yearbook, Chicago . 24 Humphrey PA, Franquemont DW, Geary WA, Kerns BJM, Iglehart JD, Marks JR (1994) Immunodetection of p53 protein in noninvasive epithelial proliferative breast disease. Appl Immunohistochem 2: 22-28 25 Isaacs WB, Carter BS, Ewing CM (1991) Wild-type p53 supresses growth of human prostate cancer cells containing mutant p53 alleles. Cancer Res 51: 4716-4720 26 Ittmann M, Wieczorek R, Heller P, Dave A, Provet J, Krolewski ( 1994) Alterations in the p53 and MDM-2 genes are infrequent in clinically localized, stage B prostate adenocarcinomas. Am J Pathol145: 287-293 27 Kallakury BVS, Figge J, Ross JS, Fisher HAG, Figge HL, Jennings TA (1994) Association of p53 immunoreactivity with high Gleason tumor grade in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 25: 92-97 28 Lee S, Ro J, Park K, Kwon K, Ayala A (1994) Expression of p53 in the benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate adenocarcinoma: An immunohistochemical study with correlation of PCNA expression. Mod Pathol 7: 78A (abstract) 29 Levine AJ, Momand J, Finlay CA (1991) The p53 tumor sup~ressor gene. Nature 351: 453-456 3 Linden MD, Nathanson D, Zarbo RJ (1994) Evaluation of anti-p53 antibody staining. quality control and technical considerations. Appl Immunohistochem 2: 218-224 31 Loning T, Schlechte H, Friedrichs K, Schoor D, Ditscherlein G, Bommer G, Loning S (1993) p53 in urogenital tumors: analysis of expression and mutation. Verh Dtsch Ges Path 77: 117-118 32 Losi L, Di Gregorio C, Brausi M, Fante R, Hurlimann J (1994) Expression of p53 protein in prostate cancers of different histologic types. Path Res Pract 190: 384-388 33 McNeal JE, Bostwick DG (1986) Intraductal dysplasia: A premalignant lesion of the prostate. Hum Pathol17: 64-71 34 Mellon K, Thompson S, Charlton RG, Marsh C, Robinson M, Lane DP, Harris AL, Horne CHW, Neal DE (1992) p53, c-erbB-2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor in the benign and malignant prostate. J Urol147: 496-499 35 Meyers FJ, Chi S-G, Fishman JR, de Vere White RW, Gumerlock PH (1993) p53 mutations in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Nat! Cancer Inst 85: 1856-1858 36 Midgley CA, Fisher CJ, Bartek J, Vojtesek B, Lane D, Barnes DM (1992) Analysis of p53 expression in human tumors: an antibody raised against human p53 expressed in Escherichia coli. J Cell Science 101: 183-189 37 Navone NM, Troncoso P, Pisters LL, Goodrow TL, Palmer JL, Nichols WW, von Eschenbach AC, Conti CJ (1993) p53 protein accumulation and gene mutation in the progression of human prostate carcinoma. T Nat! Cancer Inst 85: 1657-1669 38 Ohori M, Goad JR, Wheeler TM, Eastham JA, Thompson TC, Scardino PT (1994) Can radical prostatectomy alter the progression of poorly differentiated prostate cancer? J Urol 152: 1843-1849 39 O'Malley FP, Vnencak-Jones CL, Dupont WD, Parl F, Manning S, Page DL (1994) p53 mutations are confined to the comedo type ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Immunohistochemical and sequencing data . Lab Invest 71: 67-72 40 Schroder FH, Hermanek P, Denis L, Fair WR, Gospodarowicz MK, Pavone-Macaluso M (1992) The TNM classification of prostate cancer. The Prostate (Supplement) 4: 129138 41 Soini Y, Paakko P, Nuorva K, Kamel D, Lane DP, Vahakangas K (1992) Comparative analysis of p53 protein immu-

p53 in PIN . 887 noreactivity in prostatic, lung and breast carcinomas. Virchows Archiv A Pathol Anat 421: 223-228 42 Soussi T, Legros Y, Lubin R, Ory K, Schlichtholz B (1994) Multifactorial analysis of p53 alteration in human cancer: A review. Int] Cancer 57: 1-9 43 Thomas D], Robinson M, King P, Hasan T, Charlton R, Martin], Carr TW, Neal DE (1993) p53 expression and clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Br] Urol 72: 778-781 44 Thompson S], Mellon K, Charlton RG, Marsh C, Robinson M, Neal DE (1992) p53 and Ki-67 immunoreactivity in human prostate cancer and benign hyperplasia. Br ] Urol 69: 609-613 45 Uchida T, Wada C, Shitara T, Egawa S, Koshiba K (1993) Infrequent involvement of p53 gene mutations in the tumorigenesis of Japanese prostate cancer. Br ] Cancer 68: 751-755 46 Van Veldhuizen P], Sadasivan R, Cherian R, Dwyer T, Stephens RL (1993) p53 expression in incidental prostatic cancer. Am] Med Sci 305: 275 -279 47 Vesalainen SLB, Lipponen PK, Talja MT, Alhava EM, Syrjanen K] (1994) Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and

p53 expression as prognostic factors in Tl-2MO prostatic adenocarcinoma. Int] Cancer 58: 303-308 48 Visakorpi T, Kallioniemi O-P, Heikkinen A, Koivula T, Isola] (1992) Small subgroup of aggressive highly proliferative prostatic carcinomas defined by p53 accumulation.] Natl Cancer Inst 84: 883-887 49 Voeller HI, Sugars LY, Pretlow T, Gelmann EP (1994) p53 oncogene mutations in human prostate cancer specimens. ] Urol151: 492-495 50 Vojtesek B, Bartek], Midgley CA, Lane DP (1992) An immunohistochemical analysis of the human nuclear phosphoprotein p53. New monoclonal antibodies and epitope mapping using recombinant p53. ] Immunol Methods 151: 237-244 51 Wantanabe M, Ushijima T, Kakiuchi H, Shiraishi T, Yatani R, Shimazaki], Kotake T, Sugimura T, Nagao M (1994) p53 gene mutations in human prostate cancers in Japan: different mutation specta between Japan and Western countries. ]pn] Cancer Res 85: 904-910

Received December 20, 1994 . Accepted in revised form June 10, 1995

Key words: p53 - Prostate - Cancer - Intraepithelial neoplasia Peter A. Humphrey, M.D ., Ph.D., Division of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Box 8118, One Barnes Hospital Plaza, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO 63110, U.S.A.