Trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes after traumatic spinal cord injury

Trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes after traumatic spinal cord injury

Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (2015) 983–986 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinical Neurophysiology journal homepage:

245KB Sizes 0 Downloads 20 Views

Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (2015) 983–986

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Clinical Neurophysiology journal homepage:

Trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes after traumatic spinal cord injury Raffaele Nardone a,b,e,⇑, Yvonne Höller a,e, Andrea Orioli b, Francesco Brigo b,c, Monica Christova d, Frediano Tezzon b, Stefan Golaszewski a, Eugen Trinka a,e a

Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy c Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morphological and Movement Sciences, Section of Clinical Neurology, University of Verona, Italy d Department of Physiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria e Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria b

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Accepted 29 August 2014 Available online 16 September 2014 Keywords: Trigemino-cervical reflex Trigemino-spinal reflex Spinal cord injury Reticulospinal tract Propriospinal neurons Deltoid muscle Biceps muscle

h i g h l i g h t s  Trigemino-cervical reflex (TCR) and trigemino-spinal reflex (TSR) responses can be recorded from

upper limb muscles only in SCI patients.  These EMG responses in the neck muscles were significantly higher in SCI patients.  Synaptic plasticity and sprouting processes may contribute to the findings.

a b s t r a c t Objective: After spinal cord injury (SCI) reorganization of spinal cord circuits occur both above and below the spinal lesion. These functional changes can be determined by assessing electrophysiological recording. We aimed at investigating the trigemino-cervical reflex (TCR) and trigemino-spinal reflex (TSR) responses after traumatic SCI. Methods: TCR and TSR were registered after stimulation of the infraorbital nerve from the sternocleidomastoid, splenius, deltoid, biceps and first dorsal interosseous muscles in 10 healthy subjects and 10 subjects with incomplete cervical SCI. Results: In the control subjects reflex responses were registered from the sternocleidomastoid, and splenium muscles, while no responses were obtained from upper limb muscles. In contrast, smaller but clear short latency EMG potentials were recorded from deltoid and biceps muscles in about half of the SCI patients. Moreover, the amplitudes of the EMG responses in the neck muscles were significantly higher in patients than in control subjects. Conclusion: The reflex responses are likely to propagate up the brainstem and down the spinal cord along the reticulospinal tracts and the propriospinal system. Despite the loss of corticospinal axons, synaptic plasticity in pre-existing pathways and/or formation of new circuits through sprouting processes above the injury site may contribute to the findings of this preliminary study and may be involved in the functional recovery. Significance: Trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes can be used to demonstrate and quantify plastic changes at brainstem and cervical level following SCI. Ó 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

⇑ Corresponding author at: Department of Neurology – ‘‘F. Tappeiner’’ Hospital – Meran/o, Via Rossini, 5, 39012 Meran/o (BZ), Italy. Tel.: +39 0473/264616; fax: +39 0473/264449. E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Nardone).

Adaptive changes within spared neuronal circuitries reflect the reorganization of nervous system after SCI and may occur at cortical, brainstem, or spinal levels. Reorganization of intraspinal circuits may occur both above and below a spinal lesion (Raineteau and Schwab, 2001; Bareyre et al., 2004). This ability 1388-2457/Ó 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.


R. Nardone et al. / Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (2015) 983–986

of the adult central nervous system to reorganize its circuits over time following injury is the key to understand the functional improvement in patients with SCI. Changes in the sensorimotor system after SCI can be reliably determined by assessing electrophysiological recordings. Electrical stimulation to the supraorbital and infraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerve induces early and late reflex evoked responses in neck and upper limb muscles, termed trigemino-cervical reflexes (TCR) and trigemino-spinal reflexes (TSR) (Sartucci et al., 1986; Di Lazzaro et al., 1995, 1996, 2006; Ertekin et al., 1996, 2001; Leandri et al., 2001; Serrao et al., 2005, 2011; Bartolo et al., 2008; Nardone et al., 2008; Kiziltan et al., 2014). These responses probably have a different functional significance. The early responses are mediated by non-nociceptive afferents and functionally resemble the R1 component of the blink reflex (Shahani and Young, 1972), while the late responses have been related to movements of head retraction as a protective mechanism against a nociceptive stimulus on the face (Sartucci et al., 1986; Ertekin et al., 1996). A polysynaptic pathway provides the neural network required for these highly integrated motor responses influenced by converging sensory inputs. The nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis and from there efferent projections in the reticulobulbar and reticulospinal tracts are the central structure mediating the neural circuitry underlying these reflex responses. Reticulospinal fibers in general do not form well-defined tracts, but are scattered throughout the anterior and lateral columns and are known to project directly to the PNs (Nathan et al., 1996). The PNs are a population of spinal cord interneurons that connect multiple spinal cord segments and participate in complex or ‘‘long’’ motor reflexes (Flynn et al., 2011). These neuronal pathways may represent an important substrate for recovery from SCI and contribute to plastic reorganization of spinal circuits. Since these neuronal circuits may undergo an extensive remodelling after SCI, in this study we aimed at evaluating the early TCR and the TSR responses in subjects with incomplete chronic cervical SCI. We hypothesize that the reorganizational processes following SCI may induce changes in the polysynaptic pathways that mediate the reflex interaction between trigeminal afferents and cervical spinal cord motoneurons, resulting in reflex responses that are different from those of healthy subjects. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Subjects Ten subjects (mean age 44.8 years, range 24–62, seven men and three women) with chronic cervical SCI and bilateral limb involvement, classified as grades B, C or D according to the American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale (Marino et al., 2003), were enrolled in the study. Ten healthy volunteers (mean age 44.2 years, range 24–58, seven men and three women) participated as sex- and age-matched controls. Clinical and demographic features of the patients are shown in Table 1. Patients and control subjects provided informed consent before participation in the study, which was performed according to the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee. Inclusion criteria were: (a) ability to activate the above mentioned muscles against gravity; (b) ability to give informed consent and comprehend instructions. Exclusion criterium was the presence of other neurological conditions, including traumatic brain injury and any history of cervical radiculopathy or polyneuropathies. 2.2. Experimental procedure Surface EMG activity was recorded bilaterally using 0.9 cm. diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes.

For the sternocleoidomastoid (SCM) muscle the active electrode was placed over the upper half of the muscle, approximately 8 cm above a reference electrode on the clavicle; for splenius capitis the active electrode was placed approximately 6–8 cm lateral to C4, where the muscle can be palpated, with a reference on the spinous process of C7; for deltoid the active electrode was placed over the anterior part of the muscle belly, with the reference on the acromion; for biceps the active electrode was placed over the midregion of the muscle and the reference on the tendon; for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) the active electrode was placed over the motor point and the reference over the metacarpophalangeal joint (Di Lazzaro et al., 1995). Patients and controls were asked to contract the muscles at 30% of the maximum strength so as to facilitate the appearance of reflex responses. The EMG was amplified (Digitimer, D150), bandpass filtered (30–3000 Hz) and averaged (512 trials) using a sampling rate of 5 kHz from 20 ms before the stimulus to 80 ms afterwards. Electrical stimuli (50 ls duration) were applied to the left infraorbital nerves via bipolar surface electrodes fixed near their point of exit from the skull. The intensity was adjusted to be 3 times of the perceptual threshold, which most subjects regarded as strong but not painful. The repetitive rate was usually 3 Hz. Amplitude where measured peak to peak in the unrectified mean. Because the size of the EMG responses is linearly related to the degree of background muscle contraction (Di Lazzaro et al., 1995, 1996), the size of the potentials was expressed as a ratio to the mean rectified surface EMG activity preceding the stimulus. Since the size of the responses varied considerably from subject to subject, we took the square root of the amplitude values to transform the distribution of the data into a Gaussian form. 2.3. Statistical analysis Statistics were carried out using the software environment R (R Core Team, 2014). We ensured that the data was normal distributed by calculating a Shapiro–Wilk-test for each response variable. Since results of all tests for normal distribution yielded a p > .05, we calculated three ANOVAs (function aov) for each of the measures amplitude, onset latency and first peak latency. Each of these ANOVAs included the between-subject factor group (controls vs. patients), and the within-subject factors muscle (SCM vs. splenius capitis) and side (ipsi- vs. contralateral). The resulting p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni correction. Thus, a p-value of p < 0.016 was considered as significant. 3. Results As previously described (Di Lazzaro et al., 1995, 1996), in the healthy subjects the clearest responses were obtained in the SCM when they were activated bilaterally by holding the head raised in the supine position. Stimulation of the left infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve produced in the unrectified, averaged surface EMG a bilateral response, which consisted of positive/negative wave with a mean onset latency of about 13 ms, the positive peak at about 19 ms and the negative peak at about 31 ms. Short-latency EMG potentials were also recorded in the splenius capitis when the muscle was activated by extending the neck. No responses were observed in deltoid, biceps, or FDI muscles. In SCI patients, stimulation of the left infraorbital nerve induced responses in the SCM and splenius muscles of similar onset and first peak latencies, but of significantly increased peak-to-peak size compared to healthy controls (F(1,66) = 6.11; p = .016). Moreover, a clear response was registered from tonically active deltoid in 6 of the 10 patients (bilaterally in 5 patients, only ipsilateral in one patient), and from biceps in 5 out of the 10 patients (bilaterally in all patients) (see example in Fig. 1).


R. Nardone et al. / Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (2015) 983–986 Table 1 Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients with spinal cord injury. Patients

A (y)



Time since SCI


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

54 42 48 28 24 62 45 50 56 39


Disc prolaps Fracture Fracture Fracture Fracture Fracture Fracture Fracture Disc prolaps Fracture

17 13 5 8 4 15 10 8 6 7

C6/D C7/D C5/D C7/D C7/B C5/C C6/B C7/B C6/D C6/B

UL motor score

LL motor score





41 42 40 46 22 30 20 26 42 21

38 42 40 42 22 28 22 22 44 20

49 44 44 32 24 28 17 22 46 19

48 46 44 29 26 26 17 19 48 17

A = age; G = gender; y = years; SCI = spinal cord inury; ASIA = American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale; UL = upper limb; LL = lower limb.

In addition to the significant difference between groups, as given by the main effect of group in peak-to-peak amplitude, the three ANOVAs resulted in no main effects or interactions apart from the main effect of muscle (F(1,66) = 16.21; p = .0002) for onset latency. Polarity, onset latency, latency of the first wave peak and peakto-peak amplitudes of the reflex responses are shown in Table 2. 4. Discussion In line with a previous report (Di Lazzaro et al., 1995), we failed to observe any response in the upper limb muscles after stimulation of the infraorbital nerve in healthy subjects. It should be noted that Serrao et al. reported a clear response in the biceps muscle of healthy subjects, but after stimulation of the supraorbital nerve and at higher stimulation intensities (the painful threshold) (Serrao et al., 2003). The salient finding of this preliminary study was that bilaterally stable and reproducible responses were recorded in five out of ten SCI patients in the deltoid and biceps muscles. Moreover, the amplitude of the reflex responses in the neck muscles where significantly higher in the subjects with SCI. These findings reflect a reorganizational process that involves the pathways between trigeminal afferents and both upper and lower cervical spinal cord motoneurons. The appearance of responses in upper limb muscles is consistent with ongoing synaptic plasticity of cervical spinal cord neuronal populations. This reflex activity could represent an expression of regenerative sprouting of fibers denied their original target populations by the SCI.

Fig. 1. Mean unrectified EMG recorded from the ipsilatereral (left) and contralateral (right) sternocleidomastoid (SCM), splenius, deltoid, biceps, and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles of one patient after stimulation of the left infraorbital nerve. The muscles were held tonically active throughout. Clear responses are recognisable in the SCM, splenius, deltoid, and biceps muscles bilaterally. The electrical stimulus was presented 20 ms after the beginning of the sweep at the position indicated by the stimulus artefact.

The anatomical site at which the trigemino-spinal reflex responses are integrated can be hypothesized on the basis of previous experimental studies. Since the TCR and TSR appear at the same latencies and share the same cranio-caudal progression as the motor responses involved in the startle reflex, it is conceivable that the anatomical neuronal pathways mediating startle reflex, TCR and TSR are, at least partially, the same. Interneurons located in the reticular formation and the reticulospinal pathways are the most likely candidates for this integrative role. In fact, the anatomical substrate for the startle reflex is well established in both animals and humans (Davis et al., 1982). The motor activation pattern is generated in the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis and is transmitted through the reticulospinal tract directly to anterior horn cells (Davis et al., 1982). Phylogenetically older brainstem pathways may provide a route for motor commands to reach the spinal cord, and reticulospinal systems sub-serve some of the functional recovery after corticospinal lesions (Baker, 2011; Zaaimi et al., 2012). Motoneurons receive monosynaptic and disynaptic reticulospinal inputs, including monosynaptic excitatory connections to motoneurons that innervate intrinsic hand muscles (Riddle et al., 2009). Reticulospinal fibers enter the grey matter in the zona intermedia and along the anterolateral and anterior surfaces of the anterior horns. Caudal to the cervical enlargement, the number of reticulospinal fibers decreases, and their place is taken by propriospinal fibres (Nathan et al., 1996). After experimental incomplete SCI in rats, transected corticospinal tract axons that originally projected to the hind-limbs sprout and sent collaterals into the cervical grey matter where they contact with PNs and increase their terminal arborization onto second motoneurons (Bareyre et al., 2004). These neurons provide a disynaptic route by which corticospinal neurons can influence forearm motoneurons (Alstermark et al., 1999), although they may normally be subject to high levels of inhibition both in anaesthetized (Maier et al., 1998) and awake (Olivier et al., 2001) animals. In cat, C3–C4 propriospinal interneurons have been shown to receive input from the reticulospinal tract (Illert et al., 1981), thus suggesting that a greater proportion of the descending drive to motoneurons came from reticulospinal pathways via PNs. The findings of our study may thus suggest the establishment of new or previously silent synaptic connections that lead to an enhanced activity in the pathways mediating the trigeminocervical-spinal reflexes, with recruitment of proximal muscles of upper limbs. Furthermore, our data underline the primary role of descending pathways different from the cortico-spinal ones in the functional recovery of SCI patients. Nevertheless, an alternative interpretation of our results should be considered. Since in healthy controls the TSR are evoked only at painful stimulation, but not at lower intensities, it is possible that an impairment of the descending inhibitory pathways (or an unbalance between excitatory/inhibitory influences) enhances


R. Nardone et al. / Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (2015) 983–986

Table 2 Polarity and mean (± SE) values are given for the onset latency, first peak latency and peak-to-peak amplitude of the responses. Muscle

Nr. Subjecta


Onset latency

First peak latency












Controls SCM Splenius Deltoid Biceps FDI

10/10 10/10 0/10 0/10 0/10

10/10 10/10 0/10 0/10 0/10

p/n n/p – – –

p/n p/n – – –

12.9 ± 0.4 12.1 ± 0.7 – – –

13.0 ± 0.5 12.0 ± 0.5 – – –

19.1 ± 0.6 18.7 ± 0.7 – – –

19.2 ± 0.5 18.5 ± 0.7 – – –

89.3 ± 15.3 46.3 ± 13 – – –

80.0 ± 11.3 68.1 ± 12.7 – – –

Patients SCM Splenius Deltoid Biceps FDI

10/10 10/10 6/10 5/10 0/10

10/10 10/10 5/10 5/10 0/10

p/n n/p p/n p/n –

p/n p/n p/n p/n –

12.9 ± 0.3 12.1 ± 0.4 18.5 ± 0.7 18.9 ± 0.9 –

12.9 ± 0.4 11.9 ± 0.6 20.8 ± 0.5 21.0 ± 1.0 –

19.2 ± 0.7 18.5 ± 0.6 23.3 ± 0.7 24.1 ± 0.9 –

19.3 ± 0.6 18.2 ± 0.7 25.5 ± 0.8 26.1 ± 0.7 –

95.1 ± 14.4 54.4 ± 17.0 31.8 ± 10.9 33.8 ± 12.4 –

92.9 ± 17.1 83.9 ± 21.2 39.4 ± 13.9 35.1 ± 14.1 –

SCM = sternocleidomastoid, FDI = first dorsal interosseous, p = positive, n = negative. a Number of subjects in which a clear and reproducible response can be recorded.

the TRS-mediating neural circuitries leading to the appearance of such reflexes also at low electrical intensity in SCI patients. Anyway, the study of the trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes can be used to demonstrate and quantify plastic changes at the brainstem and cervical level in patients following SCI. A limitation of this preliminary study is the small number of patients. Moreover, the involvement of motor function is rather heterogeneous (ASIA score range from B to D). For these reasons it is impossible to correlate the reflex findings and the degree of motor impairment or other clinical or electrophysiological variables. Further studies are needed to provide further insights into these reorganizational changes, assess their relation with clinical changes, and determine whether the observed abnormalities in trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes may serve as objective outcome measure in the design of clinical trials. Acknowledgements Conflict of interest: None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest. References Alstermark B, Isa T, Ohki Y, Saito Y. Disynaptic pyramidal excitation in forelimb motoneurons mediated via C(3)–C(4) propriospinal neurons in the Macaca fuscata. J Neurophysiol 1999;82:3580–5. Baker SN. The primate reticulospinal tract, hand function and functional recovery. J Physiol 2011;589:5603–12. Bareyre FM, Kerschensteiner M, Raineteau O, Mettenleiter TC, Weinmann O, Schwab ME. The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:269–77. Bartolo M, Serrao M, Perrotta A, Tassorelli C, Sandrini G, Pierelli F. Lack of trigeminocervical reflexes in progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord 2008;23:1475–9. Davis M, Gendelman DS, Tischler MD, Gendelman PM. A primary acoustic startle circuit: lesion and stimulation studies. J Neurosci 1982;2:791–805. Di Lazzaro V, Quartarone A, Higuchi K, Rothwell JC. Short latency trigemico-cervical reflexes in man. Exp Brain Res 1995;102:474–82. Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Nardone R, Tartaglione T, Quartarone A, Tonali P, Rotthwell JC. Preliminary clinical observations on a new trigeminal reflex: the trigemino-cervical reflex. Neurology 1996;46:479–85. Di Lazzaro V, Guney F, Akpinar Z, Yürüten B, Oliviero A, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Tonali PA, Rothwell JC. Trigemino-cervical reflexes: clinical applications and neuroradiological correlations. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2006;58:110–9.

Ertekin C, Celebisoy N, Uludag B. Trigemino-cervical reflexes in normal subjects. J Neurol Sci 1996;143:84–90. Ertekin C, Celebisoy N, Uludag B. Trigemino-cervical reflexes elicited by stimulation of the infraorbital nerve: head retraction reflex. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001;18:378–85. Flynn JR, Graham BA, Galea MP, Callister RJ. The role of propriospinal interneurons in recovery from spinal cord injury. Neuropharmacology 2011;60:809–22. Illert M, Jankowska E, Lundberg A, Odutola A. Integration in descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat. 7. Effects from the reticular formation on C3–C4 propriospinal neurones. Exp Brain Res 1981;42:269–81. Kızıltan ME, Gunduz A, Kızıltan G, Tekeog˘lu A, Sohtaog˘lu M. Brainstem and spinal reflex studies in patients with primary progressive freezing of gait. J Neurol Sci 2014;343:51–5. Leandri M, Gottlieb A, Cruccu G. Head extensor reflex evoked by trigeminal stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:1828–32. Maier MA, Illert M, Kirkwood PA, Nielsen J, Lemon RN. Does a C3–C4 propriospinal system transmit corticospinal excitation in the primate? An investigation in the macaque monkey. J Physiol 1998;511:191–212. Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, et al. ASIA Neurological Standards Committee 2002, international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003;26:S50–6. Nardone R, Ausserer H, Bratti A, Covi M, Lochner P, Marth R, et al. Trigemino-cervcal refelx abnormalities in patients with migraine and cluster headache. Headache 2008;48:578–85. Nathan PW, Smith M, Deacon P. Vestibulospinal, reticulospinal and descending propriospinal fibres in man. Brain 1996;119:1809–33. Olivier E, Baker SN, Nakajima K, Brochier T, Lemon RN. Investigation into nonmonosynaptic corticospinal excitation of macaque upper limb single motor units. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:1573–86. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2014. Raineteau O, Schwab ME. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:263–73. Riddle CN, Edgley SA, Baker SN. Direct and indirect connections with upper limb motoneurons from the primate reticulospinal tract. J Neurosci 2009;29:4993–9. Sartucci F, Rossi A, Rossi B. Trigemino cervical reflex in man. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986;26:123–9. Serrao M, Rossi P, Parisi L, Perrotta A, Bartolo M, Cardinali P, et al. Trigeminocervical-spinal reflexes in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:1697–703. Serrao M, Perrotta A, Bartolo M, Fiermonte G, Pauri F, Rossi P, Parisi L, Pierelli F. Enhanced trigemino-cervical-spinal reflex recovery cycle in pain-free migraineurs. Headache 2005;45:1061–8. Serrao M, Di Fabio R, Bartolo M, Perrotta A, Tassorelli C, Coppola G, et al. The contribution of trigemino-cervical reflexes in distinguishing progressive supranuclear palsy from multiple system atrophy. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:1812–5. Shahani BT, Young RR. Human orbicularis oculi reflexes. Neurology 1972;22:149–54. Zaaimi B, Edgley SA, Soteropoulos DS, Baker SN. Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey. Brain 2012;135:2277–89.